January 2024 | Volume 15, Issue 6


Watch the full video and find the accompanying article from Reuters.

Binance chief Changpeng Zhao stepped down and pleaded guilty to breaking U.S. anti-money laundering laws as part of a $4.3 billion settlement resolving a years-long probe into the world's largest crypto exchange, prosecutors said recently. The deal, which will see Zhao personally pay $50 million, was described by prosecutors as one of the largest corporate penalties in U.S. history. It is another blow to the crypto industry that has been beset by investigations and comes on the heels of the recent fraud conviction of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.

However several legal experts said it was a good outcome for Zhao, leaving his vast wealth intact and allowing him to retain his stake in Binance, the exchange he founded in 2017. Binance broke U.S. anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and failed to report more than 100,000 suspicious transactions with organizations the U.S. described as terrorist groups including Hamas, al Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, authorities said. The exchange also never reported transactions with websites devoted to selling child sexual abuse materials and was one of the largest recipients of ransomware proceeds, they said.

"Binance made it easy for criminals to move their stolen funds and illicit proceeds on its exchanges," U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said. "Binance also did more than just fail to comply with federal law. It pretended to comply." Some of the charges, which are both criminal and civil, relate to practices that Reuters reported first in a series of articles in 2022. The Justice Department, which negotiated the settlement with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Treasury Department, is seeking an 18-month prison sentence for Zhao, the maximum suggested under federal guidelines, the New York Times reported.

Binance's former chief compliance officer Samuel Lim was charged by the CFTC, the agency said. Neither Lim nor his lawyers responded to requests for comment. Binance will pay $1.81 billion within 15 months, and a further $2.51 billion forfeiture as part of the deal, prosecutors said.

Zhao, a billionaire, was born in China and moved to Canada at the age of 12. He pleaded guilty in a Seattle court. "Today, I stepped down as CEO of Binance," Zhao said on social media after the settlement was announced. "Admittedly, it was not easy to let go emotionally. But I know it is the right thing to do. I made mistakes, and I must take responsibility. This is best for our community, for Binance, and for myself."

While authorities have probed Zhao and Binance for years, Zhao's exit marks a dramatic development for one of the most powerful figures in the crypto industry, and for Binance. The deal raises questions over the future of the crypto exchange, which he has tightly controlled.

Richard Teng, a longtime Binance executive, will take over at Binance, Zhao said in his post. "These resolutions acknowledge our company’s responsibility for historical, criminal compliance violations, and allow our company to turn the page," Binance said in a statement.

In a separate statement, Teng said that his focus would be on "reassuring users that they can remain confident in the financial strength, security and safety of the company."

Zhao Retains Binance Stake

Vanderbilt University law professor Yesha Yadav said while the fine was extremely large, it appeared manageable for Binance. "This deal...looks designed to give Binance the chance to live another day, while removing CZ, a figurehead who has been so intrinsically linked to the growth of a business model," she said.

Since Zhao appears to be retaining his stake in Binance, however, it's possible he may still be able to exert influence on the company, Yadav added. Zhao is worth $10.2 billion, according to Forbes. Given the seriousness of the violations and actors involved, Zhao appears to have "come out of this looking pretty good" as the U.S. government likely had to entice him to come to the U.S., said Robert Frenchman of Mukasey Frenchman LLP. "He still has enormous wealth," Frenchman said. "He isn't likely to spend too much time in a U.S. jail. He retains his ownership stake in Binance, a company that has now resolved some of its biggest legal issues."

Prosecutors likely weighed those benefits for Zhao against the possibility that he may not have otherwise surrendered and the desire to convince Binance to agree to pay a hefty sum, said Jeffrey Cohen, an assistant professor at Boston College Law School and former federal prosecutor. "If you can get a good number for a corporate fine and the cost is that the individual defendants take a slightly lesser penalty, the government makes that calculation," Cohen said.

 “Potentially Illegal”

Binance has been under the Justice Department's scrutiny since at least 2018, Reuters reported last year, just one of a string of legal headaches it faces in the United States. Federal prosecutors asked the company in December 2020 to provide internal records about its anti-money laundering efforts, along with communications involving Zhao. The CFTC filed its civil charges against Binance in March, alleging it failed to implement an effective anti-money laundering program to detect and prevent terrorist financing.

Internally, Binance officers and employees acknowledged that the platform facilitated "potentially illegal activities," the CFTC alleged. In February 2019, Binance's Lim received information on transactions by the militant Palestinian group Hamas on Binance, the CFTC wrote.

Lim, a Singaporean, "explained to a colleague that terrorists usually send ‘small sums’ as ‘large sums constitute money laundering'," the CFTC said in its March lawsuit.

Daniel Silva, a partner at law firm Buchalter and former federal prosecutor said the allegations likely could have supported charges against Zhao carrying stiffer penalties like fraud or money laundering. "He was at risk of much more serious charges, and so this resolution is a very favorable one for him," Silva said.

Even so, a guilty plea involving the CEO of a company is rare and underscores the Justice Department's push under Democratic leadership for charges against executives. "The government is beating a drum on the issue of individual accountability," said Kit Addleman, a partner with Haynes Boone law firm in Dallas.

She noted the size of the fines make clear the U.S. government wants to rein in the crypto sector, describing the financial size of the deal as "staggering."

Discussion Questions

  1. Explain what money laundering is and explain the implications of money laundering
    According to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network:

    Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them. Through money laundering, the criminal transforms the monetary proceeds derived from criminal activity into funds with a legal source. This process has devastating social consequences. For one thing, money laundering provides the fuel for drug dealers, terrorists, arms dealers, and other criminals to operate and expand their criminal enterprise. We know that criminals manipulate financial systems in the United States and abroad to further a wide range of illicit activities. Left unchecked, money laundering can erode the integrity of our nation’s financial institutions.”

  2. In your reasoned opinion, should a chief executive officer (CEO) be held personally responsible for the wrongdoings of their company? Why or why not?
    This is an opinion question, so student responses may vary. In your author’s opinion, the answer is a definitive “Yes.”

    Historically, top executives were able to successfully argue that they were not responsible for illicit corporate activity because they were not personally involved in the activity, did not condone it, and were not aware of it. This reminds your author of the saying “See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil,” which can be traced to (among other sources) a Japanese pictorial maxim depicting three monkeys with their hands covering their respective eyes, ears, and mouths. Although this saying was originally meant to convey the importance of prudence and avoiding evil, in the United States it has come to reference an attempt to avoid complicity in bad acts by ignoring it.

    Today, executives, including CEOs, can be held personally liable for the wrongdoings of their company. The standard that is used now is whether the executive either a) had actual knowledge of the wrongdoings or b) should have known about the wrongdoings, based on the circumstances of the case. Ignorance is no longer a defense.

  3. In your reasoned opinion, does this case indicate that the U.S. government wants to “rein in” the crypto sector? Explain your response.
    This is an opinion question, so student responses may vary. In your author’s opinion, this case could very well be indicative of the government’s desire to regulate the crypto sector; however, the sector has been a “lawless frontier” since its development, and again, in your author’s opinion, it is ripe for review given the potential for criminality in the sector. Ordinary currency and securities have long been subject to regulation in the United States—Since cryptocurrency has characteristics of both currency and securities (given the investment motives of many who purchase cryptocurrency), that makes the argument for government regulation of it even stronger.