Google Removes Links to California News Sites | May 2024
May 2024 | Volume 15, Issue 10
Read the full article from CNN.
According to the article, Google is removing links to California news websites in reaction to proposed state legislation requiring big tech companies to pay news outlets for their content, the company announced recently in a blog post.
Google, which is a subsidiary of Alphabet, wrote the move would affect only a small percentage of California users, and is intended as a “test,” allowing the company to gauge “the impact of the legislation on our product experience.”
The California Journalism Preservation Act
The California Journalism Preservation Act, which was introduced in March 2023 and is still awaiting a hearing by the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee, would require digital platforms like Google and Meta to pay a “journalism usage fee” to eligible news outlets when they use their content alongside digital ads.
The bill comes as more people have shifted away from finding and consuming news though traditional media and toward social and online platforms. The legislation was introduced amid fears the companies’ news aggregation practices will siphon users away from news websites, which have sounded the alarm about how platforms have gained increasingly unfettered control over the content they allow users to see.
California State Senate President Pro-Tempore Mike McGuire, a co-author of the bill, recently called the move an act of “bullying” and an “abuse of power.”
“This is a dangerous threat by Google that not only sets a terrible precedent here in America but puts public safety at risk for Californians who depend on the news to keep us informed of life-threatening emergencies and local public safety incidents,” he wrote in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. “This is a breach of public trust, and we call on Google executives to answer for this stunt."
Bill Proponents’ Stance
Lawmakers and proponents of the bill argue tech giants make money by sharing content from small and local news publishers, but the publishers do not reap the same financial benefits.
“These dominant digital ad companies are enriching their own platforms with local news content without adequately compensating the originators,” the bill’s co-author, Assembly member Buffy Wicks, wrote in a statement when the legislation was first introduced in March 2023. “It’s time they start paying market value for the journalism they are aggregating at no cost from local media.”
Charles F. Champion, the president and CEO of the California News Publishers Association, said Google is suppressing California news.
“The fact that one company can shut down the means by which 90 percent of the public find online content in order to achieve their own political and business ends show just how much policymakers need to act, and act now,” he posted recently on X. “Google is not above the law, and they should not be allowed to act as if they are.”
“Google’s threat to deny critical information to Californians as a response to proposed legislation … is outrageous,” Chris Argentieri, the president and chief operating officer of the Los Angeles Times, told the media in a recent statement. “Google’s response is another data point that supports the need for the legislation and shows the merits of the scrutiny they are facing from the U.S. Department of Justice. California has a long history of rejecting bullying tactics of this kind, and I fully expect the result in this case will be no different.”
Google’s Stance
Google has long argued against what it calls a “link tax.”
“As we’ve shared when other countries have considered similar proposals, the uncapped financial exposure created by CJPA would be unworkable,” said Jaffer Zaidi, Vice President of Global News Partnerships at Google, said in a recent blog post. “If enacted, CJPA in its current form would create a level of business uncertainty that no company could accept.”
Alphabet reported revenue of $307.4 billion in 2023.
Canadian Legislation
Google pushed back against a similar bill passed in Canada in June 2023, writing at the time it would “remove links to Canadian news from our Search, News and Discover products in Canada.” In November, the company said in an update it was working “through the exemption process” with the Canadian government and would continue “sending valuable traffic to Canadian publishers” while the details were ironed out.
Google told the media in a recent statement that it was still working through the exemption process, but it has finalized its agreement with the Canadian government. The law is set to be enacted in June.
Australian Legislation
The company had a similar reaction to a 2021 Australian law that would require platforms to compensate Australian news outlets for using their content. In January 2021, a few months before the law was passed, Google wrote in an open letter, “(if) the Code were to become law in its current form, we would have no real choice but to stop making Google Search available in Australia.”
Google eventually reached “voluntary commercial agreements with a significant number of news media organizations,” according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which authored the legislation. Google said at the time it would pay publishers through its Google News Showcase instead of paying them for links.
Discussion Questions
-
Explain the California Journalism Preservation Act.
As the article indicates, the California Journalism Preservation Act, which was introduced in March 2023 and is still awaiting a hearing by the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee, would require digital platforms like Google and Meta to pay a “journalism usage fee” to eligible news outlets when they use their content alongside digital ads. -
Do you support or oppose the California Journalism Preservation Act? Explain your response.
This is an opinion question, so student responses vary. Your author supports the California Journalism Preservation Act, particularly since it supports journalism at the “grassroots” level and compensates those who fulfill the primary purpose of journalism—namely, to provide citizens with the information they need to be free and self-governing.
It is also important to be mindful of the primary responsibilities journalism (and journalists) owe to the public: (1) to inform the public of changing events, issues, and characters; (2) to bear witness; (3) to serve as a watchdog over those in power; (4) to convey a sense of wisdom or context to current events; and (5) to set the tone for public discourse.
Without “grassroots” journalism, many of the stories that journalists share may not otherwise “see the light of day.”
It is also worth noting that according to statista.com, Google’s total revenue in 2023 amounted to a record $305.63 billion, with most of its earnings powered by advertising through Google sites and its network. -
The article references similar situations involving Google in Canada and Australia. Explain the developments in those two countries. Will such international developments likely have any impact on what is happening to the company in California? Explain your response.
Consider the information provided in the article regarding Google’s operations in Canada and Australia:
“Google pushed back against a similar bill passed in Canada in June 2023, writing at the time it would ‘remove links to Canadian news from our Search, News and Discover products in Canada.’ In November, the company said in an update it was working ‘through the exemption process’ with the Canadian government and would continue ‘sending valuable traffic to Canadian publishers’ while the details were ironed out.
Google told the media in a recent statement that it was still working through the exemption process, but it has finalized its agreement with the Canadian government. The law is set to be enacted in June.
The company had a similar reaction to a 2021 Australian law that would require platforms to compensate Australian news outlets for using their content. In January 2021, a few months before the law was passed, Google wrote in an open letter, ‘(if) the Code were to become law in its current form, we would have no real choice but to stop making Google Search available in Australia.’
Google eventually reached ‘voluntary commercial agreements with a significant number of news media organizations,’ according to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which authored the legislation. Google said at the time it would pay publishers through its Google News Showcase instead of paying them for links.”
In your author’s opinion, the results from Google’s operations in Canada and Australia would appear to indicate that Google’s position vis-à-vis the California Journalism Preservation Act is somewhat of a “veiled threat.” Although past events may not predict the future, the fact that Google has already compromised its position with the Canadian and Australian governments may be a likely foreshadowing of the “end game” regarding California’s proposed legislation to compensate those who originally reported the news.