Skip to main content

The Science of Writing

Why is research-based writing instruction important?

As we continue learning more about research-based reading instruction, teaching students to write in ways aligned with research should also be considered more explicitly.

Learning to write is a key part of literacy education, and teaching students to write is teaching students to express themselves, to communicate, to explore ideas, and to think critically. 

How do we marry science? Of reading to the science of writing. Doctor Graham? So I'm I'm glad that you posed that question because it's a great lead in from was what Karen and Young had to say. I think one way of thinking about this is that, you know, there's been so much emphasis on the science of reading one needs to kinda step back and say, is it really complete? And I think the answer to that is no because What it's done is it's left out the science of writing. We really should not be talking about in my opinion, the science of reading or the science of writing, we should be talking about the science of literacy. And it includes both of these skills. You know, basically, you kind of a simple way of thinking about this without writing, there's no reading. And a primary purpose of writing is to have people who read and they're connected in multiple ways. I mean, one of the ways that young, I think, they're a really good job of pointing out is they draw on the same cognitive mechanisms, the same knowledge and processes and those work interactively and dynamically across both reading and writing. Tim Shannonahan has said this really well. In terms of thinking about a shared knowledge of, reading and writing, you can think of your knowledge as a well, and we have a bucket for reading and a bucket for writing. Now, again, that kind of divides it up a little bit, but we're drawing out of that same well of knowledge and processes when we read and write. Now they're not always exactly the same. I'm not saying that reading and writing are identical processes. They're not but they draw upon the same cognitive resources. Another way of kinda thinking about this is a rhetorical relations view point of reading and writing. And with that, kind of viewpoint, you think about reading and you think about writing as being operations that are aimed at creating or understanding meaning. So they have a very similar purpose around constructing and understanding meaning. And so one of the ways of thinking about that in the classroom is that when you read something, and you think about what the author was trying to do, that can inform what you write. When you're writing, if you think about your audience, that can inform what you do because you have to take into account what they're likely to know about the topic, what things that, they don't know so that you make sure they cover them. And so it should influence your writing a great deal. And then a third way that we can think about this connection and taking advantage of it is a functional relationships model. And with that, reading and writing are not really these separate kinds of things. They're tasks or skills that we use to learn. You know, learning is built in our society within our schools around using reading to gather information using writing to think about it and using the two together to be more effective and better learners. So I think one of the things that we really need to do is start thinking about the the science of reading and writing or the science of literacy or as I would put it to science of writing and reading.

The reading and writing connection.

Reading and writing are both methods of communication built upon similar skills and knowledge. What you do to support student’s reading skills also supports their writing, and vice versa. In fact, effective writing instruction has been proven to improve students’ reading comprehension and fluency.

The reading and writing connection.

Reading and writing are both methods of communication built upon similar skills and knowledge. What you do to support student’s reading skills also supports their writing, and vice versa. In fact, effective writing instruction has been proven to improve students’ reading comprehension and fluency.

Pillars of an effective writing program. 

As research grows on the Science of Writing, teachers can continue to implement strategies to develop their students’ writing skills. This includes offering explicit instruction in the writing process, devoting ample time for students to practice writing on their own, and providing opportunities to improve students’ writing through collaboration and peer feedback

Do you see peer conferencing holding a very important role in in this this writing lesson experience? Absolutely. But one of the key pieces there, I think that you need to explicitly teach children how to work with peers because working with peers is not an easy task. Actually, it's not an easy ask for even adults. So children should be taught about what to look for and how to provide feedback very explicitly. So, you know, so sometimes teachers use checklists to look for, but also conveying the message. How to convey that message. I think that actually is very advanced level of skills and there should be explicit attention to that. Okay. Okay. Can I add that research has shown including SRS D research that when you take the time to teach students how giving peer feedback? And we have several SRS strategies for getting peer feedback across the the grade levels. They enjoy it. They do it well for the most part. They may need a little scaffolding, a little support, but we have a video of some of our third and fourth graders doing reading, and they know what they're reading for. And the teacher can direct that. Are we looking at sentence structure right now? Are we looking at ways to improve vocabulary? Are we looking at the whole lesson? We have this this great, girl who was identified as having a learning disability and came in and she whenever she answered a topic, she was all over the place. Yes. We should have recess, but no, sometimes, it's too cold. And as she learned the strategies and began to believe that she could do this, then she got to give feedback to one of her peers That back and forth was as good for her as it was for the peer. We know that from peer research, but SRSD is heavy in peer and I think reading and writing instruction needs to be our kids peer plan. They made peer plan and then write separately. They made peer plan and the right together. It depends on what they need, where they are. They give peer feedback, and they discuss what they're learning. Together. As doctor Kim said, discussion is a very important part of solidifying learning. So I think that when students get the chance to give feedback to others, they are also learning to think about their own

Effective writing instruction is explicit. Some students may be able to discover how to write on their own, but learning is more certain and equitable with explicit teaching.

Fuel Your Knowledge

Take your Science of Writing knowledge to the next level with insights from our experts.

  • students working together on tablet

    Learn more about the Science of Writing in these articles from Literacy experts.

  • Science of Writing: Your Questions Answered by the Experts

    Listen to conversations with Dr. Steven Graham, Dr. Karen Harris and Dr. Young-Suk Kim.

  • student writing in workbook

    Learn about the 10 key elements of an effective writing program, from Literacy Expert and McGraw Hill Author, Dr. Timothy Shanahan.

Top