Skip to main content
Emerge McGraw Hill Literacy logo

Emerge! Author Spotlight:
Dr. Karen Harris

On SRSD, the Science of Writing, and what 50 years in classrooms taught her about helping every student become a writer

We believe the people behind a program matter as much as the program itself. That's why we're launching a series of introductions to the researchers, educators, and children's literature experts whose expertise, passion, and lived experience shaped every page of Emerge!.

Next in our Emerge! author spotlight series is Dr. Karen Harris, Regents Professor Emerita at Arizona State University's Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, and one of the most influential figures in writing research and instruction of the last half century. The creator of Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) — an evidence-based writing instructional framework with over 200 studies behind it, practiced in schools across 26 countries, and proven to produce stronger student outcomes than any other researched writing approach — Dr. Harris spent decades in classrooms before she spent decades studying them. She brings to Emerge! a career-long conviction that every student can learn to write, and that the right instruction makes all the difference. We sat down with her to talk about what it took to build SRSD, why writing has been the neglected element of literacy instruction for too long, and what happens when you finally teach children to write the way the research says they should be taught.

What drew you to teaching? How did those early experiences shape the research that followed?

I first became interested in teaching when I joined a high school tutoring group, tutoring students in inner-city Chicago whose families had left West Virginia coal mining towns in search of a better life in the city. I did a home visit with a little girl that I tutored, who lived in a small, two-bedroom apartment with about eight people. My little girl had never been beyond two blocks from her home. She couldn't have quiet space dedicated for her to do homework in, but her parents were very supportive . I learned so much from working with those young girls.

I ended up deciding I did want to be a teacher. I started out planning to major in special education, but realized there were so few jobs at that time, so I needed to take a general ed degree as well. I'm so glad I ended up getting both degrees, because here’s what stood out to me in those programs: In special education, the focus was on how to teach – why and how to differentiate, how to do assessment, how to decide if something isn't working. Special ed was all about effective instruction. But in general ed, it was more about curriculum content, or what to teach. Having exposure to both was eye-opening – particularly in that the how and the what weren’t well-connected in teacher preparation at that time.

After I finished those degrees, I accepted a job teaching fourth graders in the coal mining area of West Virginia. Those students had several short-term teachers before me and the classroom had no cohesion, and very little positive interaction among the students. I think I went home crying three to four days a week until I worked on gaining their trust, and we had a great year.

I also learned that the students in our school were divided into two sets of classrooms: one was mine workers' children, and one was mine owners' or managers' children. My fourth graders were mine workers' children, and they told me they knew their future: the boys would be working in the mines, the girls would be married. I tried to open them to other possibilities, but when I went back and visited a few years later, I found that they were correct, and learned how hard it can be to see different futures.

Then I taught in Lincoln, Nebraska, in special ed, in a school for 13 to 21-year-old students with severe learning and socio-emotional challenges. We didn't even have the special ed law yet, but I know now that many of them had learning disabilities, and some had emotional behavioral disorders. It was another important learning experience. When I was a doctoral student, I taught students with learning disabilities in summer and after-school programs.

All of this led to the creation of SRSD. I was particularly struck through these experiences that teachers and schools tended to sort of pledge allegiance to one theory — and that was the right theory to teach with. What I believed after my experiences with students is that there's no single theory out there that covers everything we need to understand about learning and teaching. There's no single theory that helps us with how different students are. So, I set about, as a doctoral student, beginning to look at how I could take all these theories I was studying and integrate them into a form of instruction that was 100% evidence-based. I wasn’t focused on teaching writing, I was building effective instruction for complex learning. I met Steve Graham, who was focused on writing, we got married, and SRSD for writing “was born.” 

One of the things that really led to the creation of SRSD was realizing that I had taken courses as a undergraduate in learning theory and behavioral and social emotional learning theories, and there was no integration of these differing theories in any of the teaching materials I was using. As a doctoral student, I took more advanced courses in learning theory. And what I kept seeing in the schools, my history of of teaching and around me now was that teachers and or schools tended to sort of pledge allegiance to one theory, and that was the theory that was the right theory to teach with. And what I believed after my experiences with students is that there's no single theory out there that covers everything. There's no single theory that helps us with how different students are. In my fourth grade classroom, I have preperma readers to sixth grade readers. There there is no single theory that can help you with the challenges that many students and many teachers face. And I set about as a doc student beginning to look at how I could take all these theories I was studying and integrate them into a form of instruction that was one hundred percent evidence based. I only integrated theories that had shown strong results in in instruction, social emotional learning and development, and so on. And it took a long time to develop that and finally research it, but we did get there.

What does SRSD look like in a classroom?

Teachers and students consistently talk about how much fun SRSD has made writing instruction!

SRSD has such great faith in teachers. Teachers know their students, they know their community, they know their school and their classroom — and they have to be in charge of SRSD. It is not scripted, and it doesn’t ask teachers to give up anything they're doing that's effective for their students.

We use six general stages of instruction in SRSD. Stage one is Develop Background Knowledge. Stage two is called Discuss It (most teachers put those two together, and they kind of go back and forth between them).

Stage three is Model It. Now, many teachers today model, but modeling in SRSD is somewhat different. What we have found more effective across grade levels is what we call interactive modeling, where the kids are involved all the way through. The teacher also models self-regulation, and this is part of what makes SRSD so different than any other writing instruction. Teachers model planning: “I know I have to plan — what do I do to plan?” And the kids all respond, “Use your strategies!” The teacher also models writing difficulties. Writing is a social-emotional experience: for example, it can cause anxiety, frustration, and procrastination — but you can handle those things if you have writing and self-regulation strategies.

We teach four kinds of self-regulation: goal setting, self-monitoring, self-talk, and self-reinforcement. Self-reinforcement is simply saying, I like this idea. This is a good paper. The sentence is awesome! These are all things teachers model.

If teachers drop the self-regulation components — even just one! — their outcomes in the classroom can drop dramatically. Students need to know how to self-regulate writing: when it's going well, when it's hard, when to ask for assistance.

Stage four is Memorize It, or memorizing the mnemonic. This isn’t just the acronym itself, but what each letter stands for, why each part is important, and how to make each part good. Teachers have had a blast with this. They've come up with guitar songs, chants, and raps. One teacher decided that they were power writers in her classroom, because her kids were into Power Rangers. She came to school wearing a cape!

Stage 5 is Supported Practice, which is working in the zone of proximal development, gradual release of control, and scaffolding, (or I do, we do, you do) ... these all truly mean the same thing. We're moving away our support as students are ready, and students do more and more alone. Finally, Stage Six is Independent Performance.

These stages are recursive. For example, if you have a group of students who need to go back and do extra modeling — go for it. You don't expect all your students to be in the same place at the same time.

What does the research on SRSD show? Why has it spread the way it has?

We've been at this since the first study that I published in 1985 with Steve Graham and a doctoral student of mine. It took me about eight years to develop the first version of SRSD.

It's called Self-Regulated Strategy Development because it brings together so many different strategies — strategies for teaching, strategies for learning, for reading, for writing, now for math, science, and more. It's gone way beyond just writing, which is where I still focus.

There are over 200 studies now. That includes experimental, quasi-experimental, and single-case design studies — if they meet the requirements for high-quality research, they're included. SRSD research and instruction are happening in 26 countries. While we have learned so much, we still continue to learn.

Research has also looked at all kinds of settings — inclusive classrooms, low-income schools, medium-income and higher-income schools. One of the meta-analyses that came out just a few years ago showed it was effective across socio-economic status. In fact, SRSD has the largest effect sizes in writing outcomes across multiple outcomes of any researched writing approach.

Research has shown that SRSD works for students with writing difficulties, students with writing disabilities, students with learning disabilities, and students with emotional behavior disorders. It works for the whole class and small groups. It's now researched and very effective across grades one to twelve.

One of the things we have explained since early on with SRSD is that when you teach writing, you can get some improvements in reading. It's not a magic fix-all, but working on reading and understanding text and then writing — especially about something you're learning about, or something you care about — helps you organize what you know, think about the topic more, and when you're reading, it helps with comprehension.

Writing has long been an under studied and appreciated part of literacy. SRSD spread the way it has because teachers were looking for something that works. We're so fortunate that writing is finally getting the attention it needs and deserves.

What have you found when SRSD is brought into the earliest grades?

I was initially really very nervous about taking SRSD below third grade. I partnered with Dr. Young-Suk Kim at University of California, Irvine, Dr. Steve Graham, and Dr. April Camping to research SRSD for first and second grade for several years. We were in low-income school districts in California and Florida. We developed source texts that first and second graders could mark up for learning how to write to inform or to persuade. At the same time — and this is controversial — we taught sentence construction, spelling, handwriting, paragraphs, vocabulary, discourse knowledge, and academic language to talk about writing. One of the most important findings from these studies is that young children can learn mechanics, sentence structure, spelling, handwriting, and more, and learn to write at the same time. These kids just blew me away. And they loved to write!

We know from research and experience that by third grade, most U.S. students either strongly dislike or outright hate writing. And this is what we get for allowing them to try to figure it out on their own — creating a great deal of failure and a great deal of frustration! I can't tell you how many students we've worked with over the years who have started out saying things like, I was born this way. No one can teach me to write. You won't be able to help me. We have to help them believe in themselves as part of SRSD. 

With first and second grade, there's no preconceived notions about ability. Those kids still love to write. 

What we know from research and and experience, by third grade, the majority of US students either strongly dislike or outright hate writing. And this is what we get for allowing them to try to figure it out on their own, creating a great deal of failure and a great deal of frustration. And I can't tell you how many students we've worked with over the years who started out saying things to us like, I was born this way. No one can teach me to write. You won't be able to help me. Along those lines, over and over again, we've heard it. And we have told them that we have something new to teach you. It's so new that even your teachers don't know it yet, which is true. They didn't. And we would get most of those kids once they saw what was going on in the class, they want them back in, and that was great. But with first and second grade, there is no barrier. These kids still love to write.

What resources are available for teachers who want to learn more about SRSD?

There's a great deal of information on SRSD instruction online, much of which is free. The website SRSD Online has examples of modeling, videos of teachers talking about what they learned and how it's working, and videos of kids. I love the little girl who says, I hated writing. I was never going to be a writer, but now I want to be a writer when I grow up. You can also look on YouTube. A lot of teachers have posted videos of how they introduce SRSD and the topic, and there's just wonderful teacher work there.

There's also our book called Powerful Writing Strategies for All Students. All of my profits and Dr. Graham's profits from that book go to women's and children's shelters. Finally, I have a thirteen-page SRSD resource list that can steer you to many other supports.

Dr. Karen Harris is a prominent figure in the field of special education and literacy. She is widely recognized for her development of the Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) model, a research-backed instructional framework designed to help students develop writing and self-regulation skills. She has been a key contributor to the Emerge! program, using her expertise in evidence-based writing instruction and self-regulation strategies to shape the program's approach to building academic skills. Her work emphasizes explicit instruction, scaffolding, and student agency, making Emerge! a meaningful resource for educators working with diverse learners.

For more, read this white paper from Dr. Harris and Dr. Graham.

Top